Looks good to me, but I have one main edit: Instead of "or former asperger syndrome" I would say something like "formerly known as Asperger's syndrome." It gets capitalized, and "former" is an adjective whereas "formerly" is an adverb describing the verb of knowing the title of the disorder. Or, if you want to emphasize that now ASD is an all-encompassing term including Asperger's, you could say "This article aims to clarify the importance of school inclusion in the teaching of English Language (LI) for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which is an all-encompassing diagnosis that includes what was formerly known as Asperger's syndrome."

I'd suggest a couple of tweaks. You don't need your "LI" abbreviation, and it doesn't help: why not just use "English"? And your last " aiming school inclusion" doesn't really work : maybe "aiming for school inclusion" would be better? And is Asperger's (capital letter I think) really "former"? This seems controversial to me, and perhaps might want rephrasing. SO (these are just suggestions, obviously - of course you'll appropriately ignore anything you don't like:)) >>>> "This article aims to clarify the importance of school inclusion in the teaching of English for students with autistic spectrum disorder (ASD), which is now taken to include Asperger's syndrome. First, we explore the concept of ASD and aspects of the learning process for students with ASD as they learn English. Two semi-structured interviews were carried out to understand this theme. The result of this study suggests that the learning of English for people with ASD should be carried out with the commitment of all those involved in the student’s life, aiming for full inclusion in school life. <<<<<<