two years is too long or two years are too long?
which is gramatically correct?
And which is gramatically correct, there is still two years to go or there are still two years to go?
thank you!!
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 5
0
If I remember my grammar lessons correctly both phrases are passive and they are both kind of clunky. It would probably be better if you used, "(subj) will finish in two years. " I'm not sure exactly what context you are planning to use either phrase but typically its better if you use an voice as it is more direct and impactful.
That being said, there is still two years to go sounds more correct to me. Hope this helps!
0
"are" if it's plural and "is" if it is singular.
0
"are" if it's plural and "is" if it is singular.
0
Two years "is" too long.
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
