is largely offset by the lack of critical distance
Does "the social cohesion that advertising inspires is largely offset by the lack of critical distance that this communality brings" mean "advertising has a positive result that is 'social cohesion' but this social cohesion itself has a negative result that is 'lack of critical distance' which ruins the positive aspect of the social cohesion"?

Context:
Like so many other forms of mass media, advertising infiltrates and becomes part of popular culture by virtue of its volume and gratuitous distribution, creating an illusion of common ownership and attainability although, as Jean Baudrillard suggests, the social cohesion that advertising inspires is largely offset by the lack of critical distance that this communality brings: ‘Each advertising image prescribes a consensus among all those individuals potentially summoned to decipher it: which is to say, in decoding the message, to automatically conform to the code in which the image has been encoded.’

Question

is largely offset by the lack of critical distance
Does "the social cohesion that advertising inspires is largely offset by the lack of critical distance that this communality brings" mean "advertising has a positive result that is 'social cohesion' but this social cohesion itself has a negative result that is 'lack of critical distance' which ruins the positive aspect of the social cohesion"?

Context:
Like so many other forms of mass media, advertising infiltrates and becomes part of popular culture by virtue of its volume and gratuitous distribution, creating an illusion of common ownership and attainability although, as Jean Baudrillard suggests, the social cohesion that advertising inspires is largely offset by the lack of critical distance that this communality brings: ‘Each advertising image prescribes a consensus among all those individuals potentially summoned to decipher it: which is to say, in decoding the message, to automatically conform to the code in which the image has been encoded.’

Answer

I would explain it this way:

Advertising creates a sense of "social cohesion" because it is shared by everyone.  This seems to be a positive feature of advertising.  It creates a feeling of unity in a culture.

However, this feeling of social cohesion makes people less critical (they do not use their critical thinking skills to evaluate whether something is good, right, or true; they simply accept it).  The final quote from Jean Baudrillard explains why advertising makes people less critical: advertisers want people to believe their claims and slogans, rather than questioning or evaluating them. This is a negative effect of advertising, which "offsets" or neutralizes the good effect.

So, advertising is good because it creates elements of pop culture that unify people, but it's also bad because it discourages people from using critical thinking.

Answer

Maybe

Answer

Don't worry, Ya.  This is a difficult article written in a very academic style.  Many native speakers would not find it easy to read.

Answer

Yes, your interpretation is correct.

Answer

Not entirely, but very close. Social cohesion causes a certain amount of communal hive-mind, so to say, which limits our "critical distance." Critical distance is that which allows us to more objectively examine issues by taking an emotional step back.

So the lack of critical distance doesn't ruin the benefits of the social cohesion itself, but it means that a different issue altogether is compromised upon. I wouldn't use the term "ruin", since that would imply that the social cohesion itself is destroyed.

Answers · 8

Still haven’t found your answers?

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!