is it correct and natural to use would in this sentence?
There is no need to be worried. I would offer you to sit here with an easy mind and enjoy your drink
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 3
0
I am not sure of the setting.
For example, if you are trying to reassure a friend sitting with you in a restaurant,
suggesting they stay seated and relax,
I would say, " There is no need for you to worry. You SHOULD sit here with an easy mind and enjoy your drink".
If you are the manager in the restaurant suggesting that someone sit while they wait, I'd say,
" There is no need to worry. May I offer you a seat, so you can ease your mind and enjoy a drink?"
You use the word "would" when things are conditional.
For example, "I would offer you a seat IF there was one available".
Hope this helps
0
There is no need to be worried. I can offer you a seat here. Relax and enjoy your drink.
For learning: English
0
On the web, I find that "no need to worry" is more used but "to be worried" is a bit different
I'd also say "and TO enjoy your drink",
but in general it looks ok
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
