Hello~ Today i have two questions.
1. It can help the enviroment to be reduce the use of damaging.
2. It can help the enviroment by reducing the use of damaging.

Are two sentences same of meaning?

and 3. GM could give a few huge companies a dangerous monopoly on global food production.
4. GM could give a few huge companies to be dangerous monopoly on a global food production.

which sentences is it right?

Question

Hello~ Today i have two questions.
1. It can help the enviroment to be reduce the use of damaging.
 2. It can help the enviroment by reducing the use of damaging.

Are two sentences same of meaning?

and 3. GM could give a few huge companies a dangerous monopoly on global food production.
       4. GM could give a few huge companies to be dangerous monopoly on a global food production.

which sentences is it right?

Answer

2and3 is right

Answer

"1. It can help the environment to be reduce the use of damaging.  /// This is incorrect.
2. It can help the environment by reducing the use of damaging. /// This is almost correct.

"It can help the environment by reducing the use of damaging products"

Or even better "It can help the environment to reduce the use of damaging products"

It depends on what you want to say, exactly.

"If you use your car less it will help the environment"

3. GM could give a few huge companies a dangerous monopoly on global food production. /// Correct
4. GM could give a few huge companies to be dangerous monopoly on a global food production. /// Incorrect

Answers · 2

Still haven’t found your answers?

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!