-------他把书一摔 ，气呼呼地起包(?)走了------ This a tricky problem. 他把书一摔: 他把书摔了 To native native Chinese speakers, they are apparently different. So what ever is the difference? It lies in two points: 1) Pragmatic effect: the construction“把 + Noun Phrase + 一 + V”has a pragmatic function that it implies it is not an independent and complete sentence, but it is a coordinate clause and there must be another one after or before it. 她听他那么说，气得把书（往桌上）一摔。 她把书（往桌上）一摔，头也不回地走了。 In both cases, the latter clause is generelly where the the focus of meaning is. On the contrary, 他把书摔了 may be a complete sentence. 2) With this constrction,you put an accent of meaning on the verb and the action it refers to. ======= By the way, I notice you've at italki.com for quite a long time. Maybe you can try communicating in Chinese. If your Chinese is alright the answerers would be glad to explain in Chinese too. Again, if you're Japanese, you do not have to worry over if Chinese italkiers would like to answer your questions any longer. Sure, many Chinese people,I for one,dislike Japanese lingering militarism and far-right thought and action.But as for Chinese language learning, we do not connect it with those degraded stuff. Even if you would be an agent against China,we'll treat you as anyone else. We will fight the Japanese as an agent, but not an agent would-be.

嗯，没仔细看

I'm afraid that the 起包 is a typo of the original 起身.

It means he threw that book rapidly and instantly or something like that : )

"throw away the book violently" doesn't mean 摔书， instead it means 甩书 or 扔书。