Search from various English teachers...
China flagChoo
I need help! Do you remember all those years when scientists argued that smorking would kill us but the doubters insisted that we did not know for sure?That the evidence was inconclusive, the science uncertain? That the antismoking lobby was out to destroy our way of life and the government should stay out of the way? Lots of Americans bought that nonsense, and over three decades, some 10 million smokers went to early graves. QUESTION: An argument made by supporters of smoking was that__ A. There was no scientific evidence of the correlation between smoking and death. B. People had the freedom to choose their own way of life. Please tell me which is right? A? Or B? And why? Thank you very much!!!

Answers · 11

1
Could you first tell me which one you think is correct, and why?
0
Very hard question. I say it's B. The supporters of smoking are not arguing that there is NO scientific evidence, but that the evidence is inconclusive. Meaning, there is some evidence but not strong evidence.
0
A is the correct answer.

Still haven’t found your answers?

Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today