Why I don't need "to" before "put" in this sentence?
Filch must have hurried off to look for them somewhere else, because they didn't see him anywhere, but they
hardly cared -- all they wanted to do was put as much space as possible between them and that monster.
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 3
1
Adding the "to" is perfectly grammatical. But this excerpt reads as though it's from a literary source, and writers will tend to play with language to create tone. In this case, it sounds more conversational or informal when "to" is omitted, like someone telling a story (as if the storyteller were rushing to tell the story also, just like the subject of his/her story was in a hurry to get away from the "monster").
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
