Search from various English teachers...
China flagdodoremi
conclude? Here is a passage ''The English do not approach life intellectually; they do not demand that it shall conform to some rigid mental plan; they are not convinced that the universe can be penetrated by thought; they are willing to go to work, either in politics or art, without a theory to sustain them; and when they are more practical than other races, it is not—as those races frequently CONCLUDE—because they are coldly clear-sighted and unimaginative, but because they do not busy themselves asking reason to find a key when instinct has already shown them that the door is wide open.'' What does ''—as those races frequently CONCLUDE—'' mean? Does this mean "those races frequently conclude that the English are more practical because they are coldly clear-sighted and unimaginative", or mean"other races are less practical than the English because they frequently conclude", or, both are correct? Why? Thank you!

Answers · 4

0
The first one is correct. Sometimes if there is extra information between em dashes like that, it can be hard to read smoothly in one go. (em dash is the name for the long hyphen –). You can try reading the sentence without the em dash to understand the core information: "... it is not because they are coldly clear-sighted and unimaginative ..." That makes the main point a little clearer. You can also try moving the middle section to the start: "... as those races frequently conclude, it is not because they are coldly clear-sighted and unimaginative ..." Hopefully that's a little clearer. This might not always work, but it can help when a sentence contains a lot of nested information.
0
Does this mean "those races frequently conclude that the English are more practical because they are coldly clear-sighted and unimaginative"--dodoremi Yes.. this is the meaning. However, whoever wrote this has engaged a common logical error designated the Fallacy of the Non Sequitur. It is a contradiction in terms to say that any collective is "clear-sighted" and at the same time, "unimaginative". To be "clear-sighted" is to be "imaginative". Discrimination in thought is by definition, and exercise in "imagaination". Otherwise, what you posted was biased writing and essentially, rhetorical garbage. Modern people do not employ Race as a premise for any conclusion unless they are engaging in biased thinking. Furthermore, the entire quote you cited consists of a common logical error designated the Fallacy of the Sweeping Generalization. Such devices are commonly seen in propagandistic writings, intended to generate hatred of a race. For example, the claim that "the English do not approach life intellectually" lacks factual substantiation, and thus fails to fulfill the Principle of the Burden of Proof. . .I wonder where you took this from?

Still haven’t found your answers?

Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today