Is there such a difference in meaning of these two sentences?
As far as I know the following two sentences both mean "Do you want to fight me"?
Do you want to take me on?
Do you want a piece of me?
However, I thought the latter one also implies that the fight won't be very exhausting for me, I don't have to fight at full strength, in other words: I would only need a piece of me to win.
Thank you in advance.
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 3
2
Hi, I have a different take on the meanings of both sentences. They both mean do you want to fight, neither means less of a fight is expected. I know the words would indicate that the second sentence means the fight would be less of a challenge but it is a colloquial term and doesn't mean less of a fight is to be expected. Either is commonly used and mean the same thing.
2
I actually think it might be the other way round.
'Take on' is used here in the same sense of 'take on a challenge'. The suggestion is that the speaker is fairly large and tough-looking, and that the other person might be nervous about engaging in a fight with him.
If you 'want a piece of someone' means you want to hurt them. It doesn't imply anything about the speaker not needing to fight at full strength. If anything, it's the speaker daring the other person to 'take him on' who seems the more confident about winning the fight without much effort.
1
I personally think you're correct in that the latter sentence suggests it wouldn't take you much effort to deflect their attack. I do, however, think that both sentences imply your superiority over them.
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
