Could you help me to answer the following questions? Thanks!
1. Language proper does not consist of signs but of THOSE that have to be learnt and that are wholly conventional.
Question: Can I replace 'those' with 'these' in this sentence?
2. Since nearly two hundred years AGO, they have shown the world that political independence and national identity can be complete without sacrificing the enormous mutual advantages of a common language.
Question: Can I use 'For nearly two hundred years now' instead of 'Since nearly two hundred years AGO' in this sentence?
By the way, which one is correct, 'For nearly two hundred years NOW' or 'For nearly two hundred years AGO'? Is there any difference between 'now' and 'ago' in both adverbials of time ?
3. I knew that I had a facility with words and a power of facing unpleasant facts, and I felt that this created a sort of private world in which I could GET MY OWN BACK FOR my failure in everyday life.
Question: What's the meaning of 'get my own back for...'?
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 2
0
Language proper does not consist of signs but of THOSE that have to be learnt and that are wholly conventional.
i don't understand this sentence. What does 'proper' mean here?
the 2nd part,, but of those that xxx and that xxx doesn't sound like a sound sentence
0
1. No.
2. Yes, you can use "for nearly two hundred years now". You can't replace "now" with "ago". "Ago" means time gone - it's only in the past.
3. "Get my own back" means "take revenge".
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
