who / whoever
(who / whoever ) did it was not an amateure.
(who / whoever) did it was not important.
1. Which is better and why?
Thanks!
My text book says first answer is "whoever"
second answer is "who"
It's very confusing. T.T
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 6
1
Whoever...is correct.
"Who" is a question word, and asks a question.
"Whoever" clearly doesn't ask a question.
If your not interested to the answer to the question "Who did it?", then you say:
Who did it is not important.
This is a hidden question.
Whoever did it was not amateur.
This one is describing the person who did it. We are not asking who did. Nor is there a hidden question.
Yes, it is very advanced, and caught out two natives. Good luck with your exercises.
0
In both cases, it is better to say "whoever" instead of "who". Usually, when a sentence starts with "who", it is a question.
Question: "Who did this?"
Answer: "Whoever did it was not an amateur."
0
조중현,
The commonly accepted definition of "whoever" is "no matter who" ; "regardless of who".
Whoever did it was not an amateur. = No matter who did it, that person was not an amatuer.
Who did it was not important. = It was not important who did it.
The adjective "important" is not used in formal English to describe a person.
He is important. informal
He is an important person. formal usage
Whoever did it was not an important person. = No matter who did it, that person was not an important person.
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
