Yes I agree that marriage should be a life long commitment, it's there to provide love and security to you and later on your children. Otherwise, don't get married. The pre-nup contract is there for the protection of the man and woman, especially if one is far richer than the other..

Nice paragraph! Just a couple of corrections but I understood everything you said - these are only minor corrections- - These days, weddingS have become lavish affairS, as young couples... (there is more than one couple = more than one wedding - everything must be plural!) - They hire limousineS and organise lavish wedding banquets... (still plurals!) - ...romance is giving way (to what?!... I understand what you mean - another way of saying this would be "romance is losing ground/importance..." Maybe "as they face a harsher reality..."? - in the face of A harsher reality (one reality - you need an article!) - MODERN weddings (check the spelling :)) - the prenuptial agreement, where couples can state/write down/put down (more informal) how their property will be divided IN THE EVENT of divorce. My answer - yes I think that marriage should be a lifelong commitment, which might be why I am still scared of getting married! I think prenuptials are a good "get-out clause" (its a safety net so you can leave the marriage) but leaving the marriage should not be a concern if you are just starting out together. If you are clinging to the promise that you can get divorced if it all goes wrong - why get married?! It doesn't make any sense to me!

Not a doubt, yes! "Till death do us part" is still the vow in today's marriage.

how about yearly contract? like a 2 year or 5 year renewable contract, like my mobile phone subscription

it's ok as long as there is swinging