about tenses
why is??
Hank will get a nwe horse every week. He will feed them, and train them. Hank will have feed them and cleaned them before 10am, because training starts at 11 am. B the time it's back to go back home,---- he will have been training the horses for 5 hours-----.
instead this
--he will have trained the horses for 5 hours.
Search from various English teachers...
Answers · 3
2
The difference between them is similar to the difference between these:
1. I am listening to music (present continuous) => It indicates that the action is happening right now.
2. I listen to music (present simple) => It states I sometimes listen to music, i.e. my general habit.
Similarly (except that they are now the future perfect continuous and future perfect simple tenses),
1. he will have been training the horses for 5 hours => emphasizes the continuous activities that will have gone on by that time.
2. he will have trained the horses for 5 hours => doesn't have the "ongoing" sense, so it sounds like it's stating the fact of training and the duration of the activities which is 5 hours.
So I would say #1 makes the sentence more effective description of Hank's work.
Still haven’t found your answers?
Write down your questions and let the native speakers help you!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
