Can you help me please)
An undergraduate degree is necessary for appointment
to the executive board. Further, no one with a felony
conviction can be appointed to the board. Thus,
Murray, an accountant with both a bachelor’s and a
master’s degree, cannot be accepted for the position of
Executive Administrator, since he has a felony
conviction.

The argument’s conclusion follows logically if which
one of the following is assumed?

= Can you help me understand the question please?
Can I say "Which one of the following is assumed as a result of the argument's conclusion"?

Question

Can you help me please)
An undergraduate degree is necessary for appointment
to the executive board. Further, no one with a felony
conviction can be appointed to the board. Thus,
Murray, an accountant with both a bachelor’s and a
master’s degree, cannot be accepted for the position of
Executive Administrator, since he has a felony
conviction.

The argument’s conclusion follows logically if which
one of the following is assumed?

=> Can you help me understand the question please? 
Can I say "Which one of the following is assumed as a result of the argument's conclusion"?

Answer

No.

Cause he/she already explained that Murray cannot be accepted. 
So as MURRAY is NOT the one.

The other will be assumed.

Answers · 1

Still haven’t found your answers?

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!