Scientific research should be subject to tighten (tighter) governmental controls

Scientific research is making progress. But(progress, but) should government controls(control) them(it) or not?
As for me, government should control them(it). First of all, we all remember the Second World War(we don't all remember the war. We may know about it, but we don't remember it). All people know about cruel, inhuman experiments that scientists did. They killed millions (of) people under the guise of good for the future. The second argument is the well-known(the fact that something is documented doesn't make it well known) fact of the creation of a hydrogen bomb by a scientist Sakharov. He really tried to make something good for (the) future. But(future, but) now his development (is) used like(as) a weapon.
Other people think that government shouldn’t control he(the word 'the' is not necessary here) science. They say that the hydrogen bomb made by Sakharov was made for good and after the
government’s order it became a weapon. They said that government decide(decides) which sphere(spheres) of science to sponsor. They give money for different types of weapon(weapons) and don’t give money for the invention of drugs which can really help to huge amount of people(help many people).
As for me, government needs to control the(don't need 'the') science. But we need to control government, too. And in this case we will live in ideal world(could live in a better world).
So, what do you think?