Four days work in the United States. Please NOT correct contractions.
The lecture explained why work five days a week can not be replaced by work a four-day week in the United States.
Firstly, companies could spend more money. Companies would have to hire new workers and it implies more office space, besides they will need to buy more computers and medical medicines. This directly refutes the reading passage which states that would increase company profits.
Secondly, the employees could work overtime to do the difference. The companies would demand them to do the same work that they do in five days and current jobs will become more unpleasant. Again, this opposes what is states in the reading which states that four-days week would reduce unemployment rate.
Thirdly, the risk to reduce the quality of live. The employees would decrease and they would have less chance to advance in their careers because companies prefer five days employees in management positions or supervision. This contradicts the reading passage which states employees would benefit spending extra time with their families.
All in all, companies would spend more money, the employees could work overtime to do the difference and the risk to reduce the quality of live are the main reasons why four days week can not replace the work five days a week.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 2
0
Four days work in the United States. Please DO NOT/DON'T correct the contractions.
The lecture explained why working five days a week cannot (if you put a contraction here can't it would remove the other possible meaning of "not only", contractions are not frowned upon today like they used to be) be replaced by working a four-day week in the United States.Firstly, companies could spend more money. Companies would have to hire new workers and it implies more office space, besides they will need to buy more computers and medical medicines. This (directly) refutes the reading passage which states that it would increase company profits.
Secondly, the employees could work overtime to make up the difference. The companies would demand them to do the same work that they do in five days and in the future jobs will become more unpleasant. Again, this opposes what is states in the reading which states that four-day weeks would reduce the unemployment rate.
Thirdly, the risk off reducing the quality of live. The employees would decrease and they would have less chance to advance in their careers because companies prefer to have employees in management positions or supervisory roles. This contradicts the reading passage which states employees would benefit spending extra time with their families.
All in all, companies would spend more money, the employees could work overtime to make up the difference and the risk off reducing the quality of live are the main reasons why four day weeks cannot replace working five days a week.
I somewhat suspect you may have possibly misunderstood at least certain parts of the lecture. Or what was read out to you.
Can you supply the context then you will get much better corrections from many more people it will assist you far better.
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
