Corrections · 2
Is this looks professional and correct? If it is not, could you correct the mistakes?
Thirdly, will this added bicycle lane result any accident that actually cause more traffic delays than the current set up. The opponents assume that using bicycle beside highway is not dangerous and will not cause any accident. However, this might not be effective solution to reduce the traffic jam in highways. Since, cars might be too fast, and compare to the cars, bicycle could be relatively slow, that’s why speed differences between cars and bikes, and small carelessness of a person might result with severe accidents. The solution advocated by opponents might put people’s lives in danger, if so, it cannot be used to effectively back the author’s argument.**I'm having a little trouble following your meaning. It seems like this paragraph is taken out of a longer article? But I'm going to make my best guess.
Will an added bicycle lane improve traffic delays or actually cause more because of increased accidents? Proponents say that bicycles next to a highway is not dangerous and will not cause any accidents. However cars are much faster than bikes and it seems reasonable to argue that small mistakes or moments of carelessness could cause serious accidents. These accidents would almost certainly cause increased traffic jams. So not only would this put peoples' lives in danger, but it wouldn't help the traffic problem.
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
