Is economic progress most important or are other types of development is equally important?

For the country that are still developing economically undeveloped, like those from the ‘ The Third World ’，third world countries, it is no wonder why prioritizing boosting the of economy is a must. As people in these world countries are still suffering from hunger and unreliable accommodation yet, economic prosperity can solve these problems practically and directly. As I know, Sufficient food, better insured stable housing and developed facilities is a basis for every citizen’s right and is a symbol of a healthy society. Moreover, starting from the economic progression might trigger the engine of other associated sections of development in other areas, for example, better social atmosphere of culture and less crime due to the increased employment.

On the other hand, it is those countries with highly developed economies that its economic progress is fairly forward might pay more attention to the balanced development of other aspects. Literally,  A fully developed country requires not only a strong economy their strong power of economic but also an ambition to build their ambition on building a healthy society for people to live in. In these cases, public welfare related goals of achieving more public welfare such as less crimes a lower crime rate (you can also say "less crime" if you prefer), better environment, accessible and fair education resources are seemingly becoming more significant. Therefore, for those more developed world countries (we only have one world, the earth, inside it are many countries), giving equal importance to gaining an equally stress on other areas is crucial to becoming a competitive nation. e challenging around the globe.

In conclusion, the priority given to different set of goals should depends on different situations and challenges what that a country is currently facing.

I tried my best to correct the sentences while keeping your meaning, I hope it is ok! :-)