Search from various English teachers...
Russia flagAnastasia Sídorova
Arm's sales within Russia:pros and const Talking about arms sales within the country I think that the most of all remeber USA. Just because of the Second Amendment to the constitution of this country that allow for everyone to have a right for have an arma.the highest rate of armament among the population. According to statistics more than half of al pruduced guns buys by USA. One of the seven persons ,who have a weapon, is American. In this country there are a lot of debates which raise question about expediency of such armamet, especially after some accidents in schools, in shops and etc. with a lot of victims. Is it really necessary and should we to talk about changing some points of the most important document of every state- about changing Constitution ? And what about Russia? In this doubtfully honorable rate we are the the eighth. It means that every fifth citizen is armed. We have more strict legislation in this sphere than in USA but we still being very armed nation. And the question is if it’s good for safety of citizens? Or it would be better to prohibit to have an arma for everybody to avoid such criminal accidents like in americans schools ?Like in the most things I think that the best way is to find the golden mean. We should continue improving legislation in these sphere, but we should not to do too much strict rights. I mean that in case if a government will prohibit everyone to have an arma, this sector will be absolutely uncontrolled. It will be one more object of shadow economy and I think that it will not promote safety. Because of this I think that comparing all pros and cos we should not to be too much radical in resolving problem of all risks connected with arms sales within the country.

Corrections · 2

1

Arm's sales within Russia: pros and const

Talking about arms sales within the country I think that the most of all remember the USA, just because of the Second Amendment to the constitution of this country that allows for everyone to have a right to have an arm, the highest rate of armament among the population. According to statistics, more than half of all produced guns are bought by the USA. One of the seven persons, who have a weapon, is American. In this country, there are a lot of debates which raise questions about the expediency of such armament, especially after some accidents in schools, in shops, etc. with a lot of victims. Is it really necessary and should we talk about changing some points of the most important document of every state- about changing Constitution? And what about Russia? In this doubtfully honorable rate we are the the eighth. It means that every fifth citizen is armed. We have more strict legislation in this sphere than in the USA but we still are a very armed nation. And the question is if it’s good for the safety of citizens? Or it would be better to prohibit to have an arm for everybody to avoid such criminal accidents like in Americans schools? Like in the most things I think that the best way is to find the golden mean. We should continue improving legislation in these spheres, but we should not do too many strict rights. I mean that in case if a government will prohibit everyone to have an arm, this sector will be absolutely uncontrolled. It will be one more object of the shadow economy and I think that it will not promote safety. Because of this, I think that comparing all pros and cons we should not be too much radical in resolving the problem of all risks connected with arms sales within the country.

Want to progress faster?

Join this learning community and try out free exercises!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today