Teenagers should be allowed to read whatever books they like.
There are people who think that teenagers should choose books themselves. Other people are convinced that children must read the "correct" books, which are censored.
The first opinion looks like something totalitarian. Teenagers, and are not only they, must read books, which they are wanted to read. Because if you will read the bad book, by your opinion, you will not fully enjoy reading. Moreover, every person have differents books which they are loved, because all people different in their preferences.
As to another opinion, it is more democratic. When you read a good book, that you have chosen yourself, you feel that exerything was done right. You can read books that suit you and you can improve yourself. For example, teenagers like read books like "Harry Potter", because they really loved their and they can learn what is kind, friendship, brave, love e.t.c.
But i can not agree with both statement. I think that if teenagers will read books without censor, they can found something is not good for them. Children usually do not look on age limit, so the chance that they will choose a book not for them is raised. On the other hand, if parents will watch for his children and control what they read, it will be useful for both sides. Children will read good books with their age-limit.
I believe that children should not be allowed to read all books that they like because some of them are dangerous for readers.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 3
0
Teenagers should be allowed to read whatever books they like.
There are people who think that teenagers should choose books themselves. Other people are convinced that children must read the "correct" books, which have been censored.The first opinion looks like something totalitarian. Teenagers, and are not only they, must read books_which they want to read. Because if you will read a book, in your opinion bad, you will not fully enjoy reading it. Moreover, every person have differents books which they are loved, because all people different in their preferences.
As to another opinion, it is more democratic. When you read a good book_that you have chosen yourself, you feel that everything has been done right. You can read books that suit you and you can improve yourself. For example, teenagers like reading books like "Harry Potter"_because they really loved them and they can learn what kindness, friendship, brave, love, etc, are.
But i can not agree with either statement. I think that if teenagers will read books without censoring they can find something that is not good for them. Children usually do not look at an age limit, so the chances that they will choose a book which is not for them are raised. On the other hand, if parents will watch out for their children and control what they read, it will be useful for both sides. Children will read good books within their age-limit.
I believe that children should not be allowed to read all books that they like because some of them are dangerous for readers.
0
There are people who thinks that teenagers should choose books by themselves. Other people are convinced that children must read the "correct" books, which are censored.
The first opinion looks like something totalitarian. Teenagers, and are not only they, must read books, which they are wanted to read. Because if you will read the bad book, by your opinion, you will not fully enjoy reading. Moreover, every person have different books which they are loved, because all people have difference with their preferences.
As to another opinion, it is more democratic. When you read a good book, which you have chosen to yourself, you feel that exerything was done right. You can read books that suits you and you can improve yourself. For example, teenagers likes reading book,
like "Harry Potter", because they really loved them and they can learn what is kind, friendship, brave, love e.t.c.
But i can not agree with both statement. I think,
if teenagers will also read books without censor, they can found something which not good for them. Children are usually do not look on age limit, so the chance that they will choose a book not for them is raised. On the other hand, if parents will watch for his children and control what they read, it will be useful for both sides. Children will read good books with their age-limit.
I believe that children should not be allowed to read all books that they like because some of them are dangerous for readers.
The first opinion looks like something totalitarian. Teenagers, and are not only they, must read books, which they are wanted to read. Because if you will read the bad book, by your opinion, you will not fully enjoy reading. Moreover, every person have different books which they are loved, because all people have difference with their preferences.
As to another opinion, it is more democratic. When you read a good book, which you have chosen to yourself, you feel that exerything was done right. You can read books that suits you and you can improve yourself. For example, teenagers likes reading book,
like "Harry Potter", because they really loved them and they can learn what is kind, friendship, brave, love e.t.c.
But i can not agree with both statement. I think,
if teenagers will also read books without censor, they can found something which not good for them. Children are usually do not look on age limit, so the chance that they will choose a book not for them is raised. On the other hand, if parents will watch for his children and control what they read, it will be useful for both sides. Children will read good books with their age-limit.
I believe that children should not be allowed to read all books that they like because some of them are dangerous for readers.
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
