What ways do recruiters use to look for potential candidates ?
In the 2000s, to fill empty positions, recruiters tended to advertise their recruitment programs. At that time, TV was also a way to announce job hunting news. Each time to post their programs, companies had to pay a quite high cost to let their information make impression with candidates. After that, job hunters went to companies to meet recruiters directly. If you lived far away from the company you wanted to apply, you could send your CV by post office. But you had to take 5,6 or even one week. It was quite a long time and didn't make sure that whether human recourse department received or not.
In about 4 years, Basing on development of Internet, looking for jobs have been not so difficult and complicated before. Just need to become a member on a job hunting websites, recruiters can update jobs and their information to attract potential candidates. That is also a good way for job hunters. They just need to send their CV to the websites and take some seconds, recruiters will receive theirs.
But their some organization, using the Internet is just the way to inform. Apply application letters in person is still priority.
Since I graduated from university, I've applied my CV to many companies. But just a few companies have responsed. That makes me think that my request is lost or ignored. Although, applying CV directly take many times and has a little bit disadvantages, at least you can make sure that your application letters are send to hand of recruiters.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 4
0
What ways do recruiters use to look for potential candidates ?
In the 2000s, to fill empty positions, recruiters tended to advertise their recruitment programs. At that time, TV was also a way to announce job hunting news. Each time they posted their programs, companies had to pay a quite high cost to let their information make impression on candidates. After that, job hunters went to companies to meet recruiters directly. If you lived far away from the company and you wanted to apply, you could send your CV by post, but (*) you had to take 5 or 6 days, or maybe even one week for a response. It was quite a long time and you couldn't be sure whether the human resource department had received it or not.Over the last few years, due to the development of Internet, looking for jobs has been not as difficult and complicated as before. You just need to become a member of job hunting websites, and recruiters can update jobs and their information to attract potential candidates. That is also a good way for job hunters, as they just need to send their CV to the websites, wait a few moments, and recruiters will receive it.
Yet, for some organisations, using the Internet is just the way to inform the public, and applying in person is still a priority.
Since graduating from university, I've sent my CV to many companies, but just a few companies have responded. This makes me think that my request was either lost or ignored. Although, applying for a job(**) directly takes longer and has a little bit of disadvantage, at least you can be sure that your application letters are sent into the hands of recruiters.
* It is not "proper" written English to start a sentence with "but" -- "However" or "Yet" would be better.
** "to apply or a job", but "to send a CV"
0
The days of speculative CVs are past.
Many firms advertise their vacancies on their own websites and many, escpecially in Europe, use Employment Agencies.
You will need two things to impress people, a dynamic CV and a "Knock Out" covering letter.
I can help you with both if you sign up for an Interview lesson with me.
My teacher's profile is https://www.italki.com/teacher/1883045
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
