Recently I bought a stereomicroscope, also known as a binocular lupe or dissecction microscope. It is an Euromex, Novex 4-AP model. It is for amateurs, although it has a good image quality and is robust. In my opinion, it has is a great value for the money. 

There are others models of in the same Novex AP family, that have higher more advanced features, such as a bottom light or rotating objectives with two magnifications (10x and 30x for example). But I don't think that I won't would use those characteristics features so I just choosed that chose what I need.

Some (better: a few) words about the photografies: photographs (or: photography) I took the images with a 2Mp Bressel digital ocular and the quality is was not very good. With The best way to enjoy a stereomicroscope the best way to enjoy it is by looking through it with yours ouwn eyes because it has two oculars ant and two objectives so you can see the specimens in 3D. Unfortunately, with the photograpy you lose that 3D feature. Therefore, evaluating the device only by photografies based only on photographs is difficult, you need to use it.

At present I am working in on an Arduino project for making an automatic tissue processor. (Related to conventional microscopy not stereomicroscopy). It is hard to do good microscopic preparations because you must put the specimen in many chemical

Introducing my stereomicroscope

Hi!
Could somebody correct my text? Thank you

---------------------------

Recently I bought a stereomicroscope, also know as binocular lupe/magnifier or dissection microscope. It is an Euromex, Novex 4-AP model. It is for amateurs, although it has a good image quality and is robust. In my opinion, it is great value for money.

There are other models in the same Novex AP series that have more features, e.g., bottom lit* or rotating objectives with dual magnification (10x and 30x for example). But I think that I won't use those features so I just chose what I needed.

Some words about the photographs: I took the images with a 2Mpixel Bressel digital eyepiece and the quality is not very good. With the stereomicroscope the best way to enjoy it is by looking through it with your own eyes because it has two oculars/eyepieces and two objectives so you can see the specimens in 3D.** Unfortunately, photography loses this 3D feature.*** Therefore, to evaluate the device only by its photographs is dificult, and you need to see it with your own eyes.

At present I am working on an Arduino project to make an automatic tissue processor. (using conventional- and  stereo-microscopy). It is hard to make good microscopic preparations/slides because you must prepare the specimen in many chemical solutions sequentially and that is very time consuming, so that this device could be very useful. I will post about that new project when it is more developed. 

*or, bottom lighting

**or, ... specimens stereographically.

***or, ... photography is flat.

Very well written and interesting project!