Summary of master's thesis (criminal procedure)

This thesis is concerned with the public prosecutor’s role in criminal investigations.* The author presents the main powers and duties of the prosecutor and calls into question whether they are still the dominus litis of pre-trial proceedings.
In analysing the above mentioned point, it has been necessary to inquire into the prosecutor’s role in both forms of criminal investigation, and to indicate those proceedings reserved for the prosecutor and his relationship with other authorities, especially the police. The prosecutor’s supervision of proceedings conducted by other authorities has also been mentioned.
The author has paid special attention to the relationship between prosecutor and court while carrying out judicial acts, thereby referring to the institution of investigative magistrate.** Consequently, the possibility of extending the court’s competences/jurisdictions? has been elaborated (judicial decision of search, appeal against charges or judicial control under article 302 of Code of Criminal Procedure).
It is to be noted that the subject of consideration was also prosecutor’s powers in relation to closure of pre-trial proceedings, viz resumption under article 327 § 1 of Code of Criminal Procedure and revision of proceedings under article 327 § 2 of Code of Criminal Procedure.
The highlighted topic has been elaborated using a comparative approach, where the author has presented the model solutions of the Spanish and English systems. Correspondingly, it has been necessary to deal with the institution of judicial investigation and relationship between the magistrate (el juez de instrucción) and the prosecutor (el fiscal), English legal regulations and the Crown Prosecution Service as well.

*use the passive voice where possible in an academic thesis. It is de rigeur.

**do you mean 'coroner'?

Very well written!