Search from various English teachers...
Japan flagNaohiko
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other, while other argue that the aid money is misspent by the governments that receive it, so the international aid should not be given to the poor countries in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? You should write at least 250 words. Many developed countries assist poor countries to improve their economy environments as duty and thereby poor countries can dedicate to control politics in order to steady or (stabilize) their economy. I have opposite opinion for this subject that international aids are useful for mutual development and make a good political relationship. The following essay will discuss it in details. To begin with, it is a fact that if poor countries received much donation or humane assistance they will not develop by themselves. For preventing this phenomenon, developed countries have better to provide poor countries with donation and also give them technical skills for independent. In japan, some of people said that we should not give them too much assistance (or cooperation) due to recession but our government continues to help them as international as a member of international community. This conducts are to attain independence to poor countries no matter how make a sacrifice of donator’s economy condition. However, it is important for advanced countries to participate in international aid. Because it is possible to get credibility from them and poor countries may be able to lead to be equivalent of developed country’s economy condition. Moreover, poor countries can get a good chance to learn skill which is to activate industry agriculture, trade and finance. Especially medical and finance aids are significant mission for donator to support local people. I think aid money should narrow down a target which can use for only medical support or finance. By limiting usage of the aid money, their governments will not waste aid money. In conclusion, some people believe that develop countries should have duty of aid and role of supporter within international society, but others disagree with it. From my point of view, I do agree that the international aid is necessary component and symbol to enrich a poor country and to make local people happy. I hope that donators have a role of observer who monitor the usage of aid money and work in cooperation with other developed countries in the future.

Corrections · 4

1

 Many developed countries assist poor countries to help them improve their economic environments as a humanitarian duty.  In this way  poor countries can dedicate efforts to control politics in order to steady or (stabilize) their economy. I have an opposite opinion on this subject that international aids is useful for mutual development and makes a good political relationship. The following essay will discuss this in details.


To begin with, it is a fact that if poor countries receive too many much donations or humane assistance, they will not develop by themselves.   To preventing this phenomenon, developed countries have need to provide poor countries with donations and also give them technical skills for developing independence. In japan, some of people say that we should not give other countries too much assistance (or cooperation) due to our own recession but our government continues to help them as international as a member of the international community. This action is to  help poor countries  attain independence   . even though Japan's economy may suffer a bit .

However, it is important for advanced countries to participate in international aid. Because  they gain credibility from the aid and poor countries may be able to develop itself and change into be a developed country with  improved economic  conditions.  Moreover, poor countries can get a good chance to learn skills which helps activate their industry  agriculture, trade and finance. Medical and financial aid is one of the most significant missions for donators to support local people. I think aid money should narrow down be concentrated on a target   limiting it for only medical support or finance. By limiting usage of the aid money, the receiving  governments will not waste aid money.


In conclusion, some people believe that developed countries should have a duty of giving aid and the role of supporter to underdeveloped nations within the international  community society, but others disagree with that.   From my point of view, I do agree that the international aid is a necessary component and symbol of our desire to help a poor country and to make its local people happy. I hope that donators have a role as an observer who monitors the usage of aid money and works in cooperation with other developed countries in the future.

Want to progress faster?

Join this learning community and try out free exercises!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today