Cheap plane tickets vs. environmental risks The issue of environmental consequences of the commercial aviation has been in the headlines for decades. I agree with those who say that there is necessity to create funds designed for handling ecological problems caused by air travels, hence air companies should pay special fees, sufficient to heal the damage. However, some feel that such measures will deprive a lot of people opportunity to travel, which is unacceptable. In this essay I will examine both sides and substantiate my opinion. Regarding those who support freedom of air travel there are many arguments. The primary reason is that travels is excellent way to spend holidays, beneficial both personally and socially. Apart from entertainment, tourism is base of economic for many countries. Additionally, the touring helps create connections between people belonging to different nations and countries. This is especially crucial at the moment, when tension between cultural and religious groups are so high and the need for dialogue is so great. Nevertheless, despite all my sympathy for these reasons, my strong belief is that this point of view is poorly grounded. However much advantages give travels for us, we shoukd not support them at the cost of destroying environment, that is home for all of us! The Stanford University published a study in 2012, which shows that one flight across Atlantic cause more harm then all private cars of passangers for the year. In my view, the damage should be calculated and compensated, despite the fact that this will affect the cost and availability of tickets. To sum up, I firmly believe that this mindful and attentive approach should be a standart in the use of any harmful technology.