Good evening,
Tonight I'm doing my English exercises. Tomorrow I'm going to find a guy with a child community.

These two facts are unconnected, and should therefore be in separate sentences.

We're going to play football in a park and at night we will look at the game on TV Turin against Fiorentina, he is a fan of Torino; He is a Romanian boy but was born in Italy, is not a lucky guy.

Sorry, but you've completely lost me here. I'm not sure what a "child community" is; did you mean an orphanage, which may also be known in these more politically correct days as a children's home? Also it's not clear whether you are referring to a man (uomo) or a boy (ragazzo) here, or possibly a man with a child. The word "guy" would normally only be used for adults, not children. However the more I read it the more I get the impression that the "guy" is in fact a boy. You would normally use "boy" or "kid" for that rather than guy. Working on that assumption I'd reword that as:

Tomorrow I'm going to find a boy guy with a child community. who lives in a children's refuge. (That's another way of saying it.) We're going to play football in a park and that night we will watch look at the game on TV between Turin and  against Fiorentina, he is a fan of Torino. He is a Romanian boy but was born in Italy; he's , is not a lucky guy kid.

THat night rather than AT night, because this is what will be happening on a specific night rather than after dark in general. You could "look at" a soccer (calcio) stadium but if you're viewing the game you are watching it rather than looking at it. ("Look at" in the literal sense is when you put your eyes on a subject for a relatively short space of time. It's different to when you "look at" a work project, for example, which is a non-literal use of the term.) "Turin against Fiorentina" is OK by itself but can't follow directly on from "on TV" like that. There is no word that connects the words "TV" and the teams that are playing. You could, however, separate it by a semicolon. "we will watch a game on TV; Turin against Fiorentina". (Note that "the" game would have to become "a" game in that case because you would not identify the specific match until later in the sentence; same principle as with the name of the film in a previous exercise.) You wouldn't use a semi-colon after Torino. His background is a completely different subject to the match and needs to be in a separate sentence. (Actually, it probably belongs in a separate paragraph.). You would have to say either he is or he's not a lucky guy (kid). Is by itself doesn't work here because it's too isolated from the noun (boy).

I met him in the gym while doing judo. He was an incredible boy guy, full of energy and no unconstrained by rules.

Again you need a pronoun or noun before was/is (essere).
I was going crazy, but today I consider him like a son.
Good night, Massimo

LESSON TEN

LESSON TEN