Publishing an article

Nowadays, we need people who think creatively, innovatively and independently, with the ability to connect (network). Creativity comes from the freedom to express its ideas and the opportunity to develop what students do best (not sure what you want to say here. maybe "creativity arises when students are given the opportunity to develop"). The educational education system should promote collaboration instead of competition, forcing students to work together, as they are going to have to work with each other as colleagues in the future. 

If we are able to customize healthcare, phones(, or ) andLinkedin pages, it is our duty to do the same for the (education) educational system. Why would (do we) keep teach(ing) the same way when everyone is unique?

(The last line would be better if you said everyone is different (there's a famous quote "I'm unique just like everyone else"!)

In the last 150 years, a lot of things have changed all over the world. Cars are going faster, phones are getting smaller, and new planets are being discovered.

"a lot of things have changed" I think you should use "have" to sound more consistent here. For example "cars have faster, phones have gotten smaller etc."If you use "have", a change is implied.

Can the same be said about the educational system ("education system", educational is an adjective so what you have written describes a system)? If we compare the classes from 1900 with the actual ones (those of today), we can truly say that they are quite similar. This forces us to wonder why school remains (has remained) the same, while when it should have aspired to evolve, which would have translateds into change.
Albert Einstein once said "Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believe believing that it is stupid". At that time, he was already alluding to the (educational system) education system, about 80 years ago (do you mean 80 years later （i.e. now?）.
Is this because we want to train people to work in factories, which explains why we put students in straight rows nice and neat, telling them to raise their hand if they want to speak and during those 8 hours telling them what to think?
How can one teacher stand in front of tens of students, each one having different strengths, different needs, different weaknesses, and different dreams and yet we keep teaching the same thing in the same way?
Students are put in competition to get an A (competing for an A?), but I would support the idea that competition does not necessarily lead to better results. If we take Frederick J.Kelly's words, the man who invented standardized testing, I quote "these tests are too crude to be used and should be abandoned". How can a multiple choice question (questionnaire/test) determine success? Most of the graduate students affirm claim that 80% of their knowledge does not come from school, but from their own experience in life. The school gives you a lesson and then comes a test ; when whereas in life, you are given many tests every day that teaches teach you a lesson.

Publishing an article