News Stations - Should We Believe Them?

There is a fierce debate about whether it is benificial for students to surf on the internet. Some TV stations believe that students can gain more knowledge by going online and they give some statistics to support this. Others, however, reckon that the Internet will do a lot of harm to the students' health and study, and suggest trying to prevent children from surfing too much. They show many true stories about the bad effects of the internet on students. So who is actually telling the truth? 

Each of us has our own distinguished views about the subject more or less, and the reporter will add his or her own emotions when he or she reports. For instance, when the reporter is telling a story about his or her favorite star, he or she might use some complementary words about it.

Tip: gender neutrality is difficult in English. One current option is to use the plural form: For instance, when the reporter is telling a story about their favorite star, they might use some complementary words about it. Considering that "you" is a plural form, I see no problem with this convention.

The competitipn between TV stations is becoming increasingly intense, so some stations would cast some opinions simply to object against what their rivals say. To accomplish this purpose, they would go all lengths to seek out for supporting evidences, regardless of its authenticity of them, Therefore, we can see that the content of some so-called scandals and critiques remain doubtful.

In conclusion, I intend to stand on the opinion that it's hard to know which station is telling the truth, due to their personal perspectives, their intention to defeat their opponents, and the beautifully-packaged presentation when reporting.