Corrections · 3
Correct me, please! Thank you! :)
There are two arguments: "imports should be reduced because money is going abroad which could be better spent at home" and "we should protect our industries from being undercut by imports produced using cheap labour".
I think that both of these arguments are right and wrong at the same time.
Firstly, it is known that imports are a part of free trade which is necessary for every state, because it helps them grow financially. But Actually it is important to decrease imports not only in order to save money at home, but also to develop internal production. For instance, Russia is faced with such a problem, because many countries have imposed trade sanctions on her (okay, but in English we'd probably refer to a nation as 'it'). Subsequently imports are reduced, and become unprofitable, and therefore Russia has to introduce new quotas on imports and exports to assist domestic manufacturing.
Secondly, there are many opinions that the government should block imports produced using cheap labour, because often such products are manufactured by unskilled workers and the material quality level is too low. But not always Cheap labor doesn't always means poor quality goods, because, for example, in some Asian countries labor is cheap due to economic reasons, but that does not mean that they produce a bad products.
I've highlighted the three times you've used (labour/labor) both are correct in different parts of the world. It's best to stick to one or the other.
это было очень интересно. Очень хорошо!
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
