Search from various English teachers...
China flagSusan
Scientific Research TOPIC:Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Topics of scientific research who should manage never fail to arouse people's attention. Some individuals think it is wise for the governments to control and carry out scientific studies, while others hold the belief that it should be personal company who takes charge of that matter. Personally, I agree with the former. Indeed, there are reasons for people to support the view that it is important to operate research project by the small companies. For one thing, the achievements made by government belong to citizens in the whole country. While, made by enterprises, they become private properties.It is clear that a successful research can bring great fortune, thereby giving researchers, mostly who working in companies, a lot of money for their huge contribute, which would become a significant motivation for them to rise to challenge. That's the reason why it is not surprising that company employees always work harder. Yet because the background, which is the determinant of recruit, of the private enterprise is not as strong as that of government, official organizations seem to own more talents of high quality. Absolutely, a team made up of talented person in all fields could much easier carry out the projects and gain achievements. However, operating a research requires high expenses, and yet it is of great possibility that it comes to a failure end. Not all personal firms can afford the payment of this heavy price. Even through, it would be a fundamental blow to some small corporation, which would leads to bankruptcy and cause unemployment. However, with the financial support of the government, organizations provide employees steadier occupations and better allowance. It is likely that researchers working for country have higher social status so that they gain more respects and admiration. Without money issues, they work in the environment of less stress, thus their working efficiency would probably be highly improved. What's more, the research controlled by government is more justified by economic conditions of the whole country. So it would be better transferred to meet commercial demands and bring economic repayment, which would support research again and have a virtuous cycle.

Corrections · 2

0

Scientific Research

TOPIC:Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Topics of scientific research should manage never fail to arouse people's attention. Some individuals think it is wise for governments to control and carry out scientific studies, while others hold the belief that it should be private companies who takes charge of that matter. Personally, I agree with the former.
Indeed, there are reasons for people to support the view that it is important to operate research project by the small companies. For one thing, the achievements made by government belong to all citizens. While, those made by enterprises become private property. It is clear that successful research can bring great fortune, thereby giving researchers, mostly who work in companies, a lot of money for their huge contribution, which would become a significant motivation for them to rise to challenge. That's the reason why it is not surprising that company employees always work harder. Yet because of its background, which is the determinant in recruitment, of the private enterprise, it is not as strong as that of government and official organizations seem to own more talents of high quality. Absolutely, a team made up of talented persons in all fields could much easier carry out the projects and gain achievements.
However, operating a research requires high expenses, and yet there is a great probability that it comes to fail in the end. Not all personal firms can afford this. It might even be a fundamental blow to some small corporation and lead to bankruptcy and unemployment. However, with the financial support of the government, organizations provide employees steadier occupations and better allowances. It is likely that researchers working for the state have a higher social status so that they gain more respect and admiration. Without money issues, they work in an environment of less stress, thus their working efficiency would probably be highly improved.
What's more, the research controlled by government is more justified by economic conditions of the whole country. So it would be better transferred to meet commercial demands and bring economic repayment, which would support research again and have a virtuous cycle.

Very well written.

Want to progress faster?

Join this learning community and try out free exercises!

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!

Start Learning Today