Prison or Education?
Recently, the relationship between crime and punishment is increasingly complicated. The issue of whether sending criminals to prison or to school is highly controversial. Some people support that criminals should be restricted and punished while others assert that the inner change is more essential. Personally, I would stand by the former argument in large degree.
To begin with, punishment is indispensable to shape a new man. To be more exact, those people who suffer from penalties is more likely to perform better in future. On the other hand, if badman is free from some reasonable penalties, more cases will ensue. Besides this, educating every criminal tends to impossible and costy. Who should pay for the bills? Victims and innocent people would be unwilling to spend even a cent. Futhermore, there is no guarantee of the education, which can be low cost-effective.
Adimittedly, changes in mind and awareness can regulate the behaviours of criminals. Particularly, it does make sense for those who commit misdemeanors and want to reform intrinsically. However, the drawbacks outweigh the merits. Since a judge has to claim the various cases, the flexible explanation of the law will come up. As a result, not only can it lead to more felonies, but also it deteriorates the sacred unchangeable law.
To sum up, both reasonable punishments and external guidance are really crucial to stop recommiting. They are not the opposite sides, actually, the two factors are connected tightly. In my opinion, it would be better to penalize all the criminals and then teach part of them.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 9
0
Prison or Education?
Recently, the relationship between crime and punishment has become increasingly complicated. The question of whether to send criminals to prison or to school is highly controversial. Some people believe that criminals should be restricted and punished while others assert that the inner change is more essential. Personally, I would stand by the former argument in large degree.To begin with, punishment is indispensable in shaping a new man. To be more exact, those people who suffer from penalties are more likely to perform better in the future. On the other hand, if a perpetrator is free from some reasonable penalties, more cases will ensue. Besides this, educating every criminal tends to be impossible and costy. Who should pay for it? Victims and innocent people would be unwilling to spend even a cent. Furthermore, there is no guarantee of the education, which can be low cost-effective.
Admittedly, changes in mind and awareness can regulate the behaviours of criminals. In particular, it does make sense to give education to those who commit misdemeanors and want to reform intrinsically, however, the drawbacks outweigh the merits. Since a judge has to claim the various cases, the flexible explanation of the law will come up. As a result, not only can it lead to more felonies, but also it deteriorates the sacred, unchangeable law.
[ I can tell some things are wrong in these two sentences, but I'm having a very hard time understanding your logical point. In particular, I am confused by the phrase "has to claim the various cases" because I can't figure out how "claim" fits into this statement. If I can understand this phrase I might be able to understand your whole point. If I can understand your point, I can make the right corrections. ]
To sum up, both reasonable punishments and external guidance are really crucial to stopping recurrence. They are not the opposite sides, but actually the two methods are connected tightly. In my opinion, it would be better to penalize all the criminals and than teach some of them.
0
Prison or Education?
Recently, the relationship between crime and punishment is increasingly complicated. The issue of whether sending criminals to prison or to school is highly controversial. Some people support that criminals should be restricted and punished while others assert that the inner change is more essential. Personally, I would stand by the former argument in large degree.To begin with, punishment is indispensable to shape a new man. To be more exact, those people who suffer from penalties is are more likely to perform better in future. On the other hand, if badmanis criminals are spared from some reasonable penalties, more cases will ensue. Besides this, educabting educating every criminal tends to be impossible and costy. Who should pay for the bills? Victims and innocent people would be unwilling to spend even a cent. Futhermore, there is no guarantee of that the education, which can could be low cost and effective.
Admittedly, changes in mind and awareness can regulate the behaviours of criminals. Particularly, if it does make sense for those who commit misdemeanors and want to reform intrinsically. However, the drawbacks outweigh the merits. Since a judge has to claim reside over the various cases, the flexible explanation of the law will come up. As a result, not only can it lead to more felonies, but also it deteriorates the sacred unchangeable law.
To sum up, both reasonable punishments and external guidance are really crucial to stop individuals from recommitting crimes. They are not on the opposite sides, actually, the two factors are tightly connected. tightly. In my opinion, it would be better to penalize all the criminals and then teach part some of them.
0
I made some mistakes in my initial correction:
To begin with, punishment is indispensable in shaping a new man. To be more exact, those people who suffer from penalties are more likely to perform better in the future. On the other hand, if a perpetrator is free from some reasonable penalties, more cases will ensue. Besides this, educating every criminal tends to be impossible and costly. Who should pay for it? Victims and innocent people would be unwilling to spend even a cent. Furthermore, there is no guarantee of the education, which would not be very cost-effective.
-------------------
To sum up, both reasonable punishments and external guidance are really crucial to stopping recurrence. They are not the opposite sides, but actually the two methods are connected tightly. In my opinion, it would be better to penalize all the criminals, and then teach only some of them.
0
Admittedly, changes in mind and awareness can regulate the behaviours of criminals. In particular, it does make sense to give education to those who commit misdemeanors and want to reform intrinsically, however, the drawbacks outweigh the merits. Since a judge has to determine the reformability of various individuals, the flexible explanation of the law will become too flexible. As a result, not only can it lead to more felonies, but also it deteriorates the sanctity of law.
0
In my personal view social rehabilitation and education should be a part of every correctional system.
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
