Should we elect young people as the leaders of organizations? There is a widespread concern over the issue whether young people should be elected as the leaders of organizations. People who are rooting for the young think that the young generation is essential for organizations to keep innovative and productive. However, their views are against by others, whose opinion is that the old have rich experience and global views which young people generally lack. I endorse the former, and believe that young people can take place of the old to be the leaders of organizations. Above all, sooner or later , the young will take over the running of an organization. If we cut them off from the leadership, for fear that they might be devoid of the competence in managing a company, we actually curb the development of society. An organization, which embraces young people and encourages them to strive for leadership, will lead to far greater strides. Therefore, when we pass the throne to the young generation, we, in fact, pass brighter possibilities on to them. Not only should we give young people the opportunity of being leaders, but we should believe that their qualities can do their credits. Among all the edges that the young have, creativity, out of question, stands out. Old leaders win their reputations for calmness and long-term vision; however, it cannot be denied that they are overshadowed by the young in terms of creativity. With this calibre, those active and creative heads will live up to our expectations. To conclude, young people should be elected as the leaders of organizations. They have not only the responsibility but the ability to take up this post.