health care systems Some people think that good health is essential to every person , so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweight the disadvantages ? Nowadays, perhaps the more society develop and the people's living standard is raised, the more people concern about issues related to health care. Some argue that medical services should be taken on by the government instead of for-profit companies. I think idealy, it should be some combination of both. First, for-profit companies have both negative and positive aspects. On the one hand, because their purpose is to make money, the cost of every treatment might be expensive than a public hospital and they will be able to unwilling to treat people who do not afford. On the other hand, due to the competitive environment, the quality of medical examination and treatment as well as medical supplies and equipment will be invested and concerned. A second, government-run health care is also a mixed bag. One advatage is that it ensures all people, regardless of income, have at least some basic medical coverage. Though , the disadvantage is that the bureaucracy and corruption may be able to occur easily in the environment that is funded resources mainly from the government budget. As a result, the quality of medical services will not get a satisfied attention. Clearly, the ideal choice would be a combination both of private and public health care. This way, the poor can have a basic medical care while the rich can choose the best services that are worth their money. Furthermore, it do not place too big a burden on government . So by combining the benefits of both systems we can achieve health care that is complete and fair. Instead of depend too much on the only one we shoul allocate evenly. By doing so can we minimize risks that each form provide.