I do not know whether it is correct or not
Article 1. Opened Expert Team as the agency of the parent company (F.G.NOTION CO., LTD) to support the factory operation process in Vietnam started on 3/2015 (VIET NAM BYRON HOLDINGS LIMITED). The factory is tentatively set to start on 8/2015, including the members:
Article 2. During the supporting period, Expert Team actively proposes the fieldwork plan in Vietnam. The tentative activity plan of Expert Team in Vietnam
Article 3. Party B will be responsible to pay the costs incurred related to the expert team in Vietnam (living expenses and healthcare service) in the scope of work supports the implementation of the new factory
In the case that the members of expert team perform a self-payment for service providers in Vietnam, Party B is obliged to reimburse these costs to Party A based on legal documents.
Article 4. This agreement is valid from the date of establishment. Expert Team is automatically dissolved after completion of initial support for Party B and when factory officially go into operation.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 2
0
Hi there, I just want to know whether it correct in grammar or not :) By the way, are you studying Vietnamese ?
0
This looks like legalese which does not always adhere to the conventions of standard English. Other than a missing punctuation mark, I am not certain what this is trying to accomplish so I'm not sure how to respond to your question of whether it is right or not.
What exactly are you asking about being right or not?
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
