Government Investment in the Arts

Government policies have significant effects on a country; therefore, these issues are open to  criticisms. One of controversial area is government investment in public services, which has a key impact on domestic satisfaction. Some people think that governments should invest more in public services instead of wasting money on arts such as music and paintings. This can be refuted by looking at how the arts can improve the society’s health and increase a sense of compassion in society.

Firstly, it is obvious that different kinds of arts can help an individual to release stress after an exhausting day or amuse someone struggling with the difficulties of life. For instance, the effects of music on the mental health. It has been proven that music can change the mood. Such a research clearly illustrates the key role of arts in human mental health. Thus, the investment of government in the field of arts is beneficial for society.

In addition to this, art bonds people from different groups of society together and increases the sense of compassion. For example, when a government holds an art event for aiding a minority group or disaster victims, people will think about these groups, leading them to understand each other better. This example reveals that how art can bring people of a society together and raise the level of compassion in society. Therefore, it is reasonable for a government to invests in art.

As the above shows, investment in the arts has important effects on improving the health of society and increase the sense of compassion between people. Thus, the claim that investing in the arts is a waste of money is refuted.