We are what we read

As *it is known to us all, reading is a critical part of learning and growth. We can get a lot of knowledge* inadvertently from books. It can also light an emotional spark within us. But is this the best method to of learning? People's views on this question vary *from person to person. Some hold that reading is *most important and that we need to read more books. However, others believe that the best way to study is practice, and to *feel the world personally.
From my point of view, it is more reasonable to support the first opinion rather than the second. On the one hand, most of the contents of the a book have a certain objectivity, and most people support the writer's view, so we can get lots of more reliable and useful information. On the other hand, by reading others' articles, we can broaden our horizons and inspire our potential. It may be true that *feel around personally, but it this does not mean that we should do practise more instead of reading books. *What's more, the subjective feeling of a person will make him or her a person narrow and biased.

The A book is a summary of our ancestors' wisdom. We should make good use of it, making the knowledge that on the book in it become our own knowledge. This is one of the most useful learning methods.

*As we all know

*knowledge from books inadvertently

*widely

*essential, more important

*experience

*personal experience is valuable/important

*Furthermore

We are what we read

As it is known to us all, reading is a critical part of learning and growth. We obtain a lot of knowledge inadvertently from books. It can also light an emotional spark within us. But is this the best approach to learning? People's views on this question vary from person to person. Some hold that reading is the best way and we need to read more books. However, others believe that the best way to study is practice and experience the world for yourself.
From my point of view, it is more reasonable to support the first opinion rather than the second. On one hand, most of the contents of the book have a certain objectivity and most people support the writer's view. So we obtain lots of more reliable and useful information. On the other hand, by reading other people's articles, we broaden our horizons and inspire our potential. It may be true that feel around personally (?), but it doesn't mean that we should practice more instead of reading books. What's more, the subjective feeling of a person will make a person narrow minded and biased.

The book is a summary of our ancestors wisdom. We should make good use of it. Making the knowledge that is in the book into our own knowledge. This is one of the most useful learning methods.

We are what we read

As it is known to us all, reading is a critical part of learning and growth. We can get a lot of knowledge inadvertently from books. It can also light an emotional spark within us. But is this the best method of learning? People's views on this question vary. Some believe that reading is most important and we need to read more books. However, others believe that the best way to study is practice and to feel the world personally.
From my point of view, it is more reasonable to support the former rather than the latter. On one hand, most of the contents of a book have a certain objective and most people support the writer's view, so we can get lots of more reliable and useful information. On the other hand, by reading other's articles, we can broaden our horizons and inspire our potential. [It may be true that feel around personally,] (i dont understand this part) but it doesn't mean that we should practice more instead of reading books. What's more, the subjective feeling of a person will make a person narrow-minded and biased.

The book is a summary of our ancestors wisdom. We should make good use of it. Making the knowledge in the book become our own. This is one of the most useful learning methods.