heritage
On balance, despite the strong argument for, it's not hard to perceive argument against. First of all, if we didn't spend money on natural heritage we would be able to allocate them in future or donate money to charity. Secondly, is it observed that governemnt need more money for things like houses and roads. Many people claim that invest in future are much more important than pay attention to past. Research prove that many people depend more on standart of life than past.
Search from various English teachers...
Corrections · 2
1
heritage
On balance, despite the strong argument for, it's not hard to perceive an argument against. First of all, if we didn't spend money on natural heritage we would be able to allocate them in future or donate money to charity. Secondly, is it observed that governemnt need more money for things like houses and roads. Many people claim that investing in future are much more important than paying attention to past. Research prove that many people depend more on standard of life than past.
you are better than me in english, I have just corrected some words to help you :)
Want to progress faster?
Join this learning community and try out free exercises!
Don’t miss out on the opportunity to learn a language from the comfort of your own home. Browse our selection of experienced language tutors and enroll in your first lesson now!
Start Learning Today
