I'm answering a question. Please check my grammar.

Do you think people should be obliged to work 65 hours a week?

No, I totally disagree with that. I can't even understand people who think that work should be is their main priority it's the first thing in this in life, and I don't like hate people who live for work and think that everyone should be like they arethem.I'm more than It makes me disagree with them even more! I think that the it is best choice will be to work for only 32 hours per a week which is and that's only4 days per a week (two days work, one day break, two days work and two days break) :-) I think it would be amazing! And, I'm sure that it won't be a problem for in the most of companies. it won't turn anything to the worst way. Of course, it will initially cause make some problems issues especially in factories and in similar establishments, but I think in office work it won't change or affect anything in offices. P.S. Yes, I'm a lazy ass)))

*Using the word "hate" in that sentence is okay. I changed it because for me that word is intensely negative. It's just a matter of preference ☆⌒(*^-°)v

i'm answering a question. please check my grammar

Do you think people should be obliged to work 65 hours a week?

No!!! I totally disagree!!! I can't understand people who think that work is the most important thing in this life, and I hate people who live for work and think that everyone should be like they are! I more than disagree! I think that the best scenario would be 32 hours per week, which is 4 days per week (two days work, one day break, two days work and two days break :-)). I think it would be amazing! And I'm sure that, in most companies, it wouldn't make things worse. Of course it could cause some problems in factories etc., but in office work it wouldn't change anything. P.S. Yes, I'm a lazy ass.