Recycling system in Sydney and San Francisco(2) Thirdly, they all have a good institution to encourage people classify and recycle rubbish. For instance, in Sydney if inhabitant throwing rubbish away without classification, they will receive warning. In San Francisco, the government already made the law to recycle garbage. Besides provisions of law, government cannot purchase appliance which is unrecyclable or release poison gas. However there are still have some different between the recycling system in Sydney and San Francisco. Firstly, those two cities have different range for recycle garbage. It is already been proved by San Francisco’s recycling system. San Francisco’s recycling system always including cooking oil. But most of citizens from Sydney prefer put it into unrecyclable bin. While, according to the data, San Francisco’s recycling company can receive 10000 gallon cooking oil per week. It can be used in produce biofuel. To summarize, Sydney need prefect its recycling system in order to make lager interest .s f w r d t e s r e w r e d r w r w Secondly, in San Franciso’s recycle system, public and recycling company already focus on water recycle. By contrast, the people from Sydney do not always care about water resource, because of the unique geographical environmental, Sydney invariably can gain enough water. While, in San Francisco public already accept and use recycled water. San Francisco's potential uses of recycled water include: irrigation of parks, medians and other landscaped areas, toilet and urinal flushing, industrial processing and cooling, and in decorative fountains.3 Because of in San Francisco, people are invariably faced with such an issue which is they cannot gain enough water. Otherwise, it is impossible to operate this city without water. However, although Sydney do not lack of water, it still is not a wise choice to waste it.