Being new is not just having a new façade. There are people who lead their lives based on the axioms passed on to them. Another group might choose to organize their lives in the same way as the layers of soil are stratified, gaining experience by the passage of time. You can think of any other established procedure, but what makes all of these life algorithms alike or even different, is the fact that you need to renew your evanescent thoughts and ideas each day. I’m not talking about a new strategy here, I’m just depicting an idea you can perceive as ‘necessity’: You can’t just regurgitate what you learn or what is taught to you; you need to analyze each day of your life to conclude it before it is lost if in the ocean of time, so that you can come up with a more evolved point of view. Each of us has certainly experienced cases when devoting our time to an idea has altered the way we rule our lives on the basis of a revised plan. It’s an irony how a transitory thought might result in a life change, but that’s exactly the point, if and if only this switch happens in a deep level; when the reason is clarified: It’s ‘thinking’ that propels your life through. You can’t claim your new day is different from the day before unless you accompany the act of analyzing your moments with you. How does your blood coagulate? The reason are platelets. And in my opinion, ‘time’ is much like ‘blood’. You need to supervise it because it is limited and crucial. I believe that time needs coagulation by something. I believe that you have lost your time just like your blood if you fail in controlling it. But the equipment to have your time under control is ‘thinking’. We humans need to intrude upon more solid thoughts as we grow older, because we all know how hard encroaching the rocky mountains of adulthood is like. But the outcome is satisfactory: more intrapersonal strength. That is the reason why I like to remind myself that ‘new, modern, etc.’ isn't really anything unless it carries the characteristic of being revolutionary on the basis of thinking. That is why I think modern art, modern painting, etc. can’t claim to be really modern unless it carries a deep idea with itself, not just a new façade.