Fixed punishment

Whether fixed punishments should be assigned to each type of crime has become a burning issue concerned by of concern to the wide public. A vast majority of people insist fixed punishments are indispensable essential to the security of our country and our people. On the other hand, others don’t buy their stories. They argue that the circumstances of an individual crime are vital to our decision about punishments so that we have to take the committing motivation into account.
In order to make a clear choice between them, I believe it is necessary for a government to be more flexible on this issue. No one can deny the facts that laws the government should take the responsibility to protect its citizens from the culprits and powerful punishments should be implemented to each type of crime in order to set an alarm for them. However, as we all know, the realistic situation is more complex than our imagination. For instance, you should appreciate why a young man killed his classmate. Did he ever get a psychiatric problem? Did he commit that for securing himself the crime for his own safety? Or even he was he disturbed and troubled by that guy for a long time. Given to the different circumstances mentioned above, the punishment to of this boy should be different.
Besides all that above, in terms of legislature and government, they should be flexible enough to deal with different kinds of crimes instead of following a fixed way to route for all of them. That also shows our respect to of the human rights to the international society. Everyone, regardless of whether they are a criminal a culprit or not, gets the a fair opportunityies to explain what he or she did and why. He or she needs （to） receive the an adequate punishments according to the situations every time.
So, that’s why I can reach to my conclusion confidently that our courts should take the circumstances and the motivation of a crime into account while when deciding on the punishment.