Do arts improve the quality of people's lives?

Some people believe that arts, such as painting and singing, do not directly improve the quality of people's lives that and therefore the government's money should be spent on other things. Personally I think this issue should be discussed in depth.

On the one hand, our daily life is composed of both material and spiritual parts. Though we need money to meet our basic survival needs, yet only being financially rich in finance couldn't cannot give us all-round happiness. Today, people have various needs in the spritual field, such as reading, writing, singing and painting. These things can improve our quality of life to some extent. Although different people have different demands, I still believe arts can do a world of good to for us. Hence, I maintain the view that the government should spent spend a certain amount of money on arts development.

On the other hand, some other people may not have interest in arts and for them it seems useless and meaningless. I'm sure there would be is a group of these people, but they can't don't represent all the people, therefore I still hold the opinion that arts are beneficial and useful.

Everything in green = corrections

Everything in blue = better alternatives