Whether different wealth background will make a difference to children's preparing for solving problems

With the growing gap of the poor and the rich, the influence of wealth has come in for considerable scrutiny；for instance, whether it will play a role in the development of children. Whereas there is much support for this view, I beg to differ.

Admittedly, children from wealthy families, compared with their peers, have fewer issues to worry about; for, as we all know, the majority of the root of the problems is attributed to/lies in the lack of money. As an illustration, it is generally acknowledged that the offspring of rich families know little or on of misery as a consequence of living in such an environment constructed by their parent to protect them from any harm. By contrast, their counterparts tend to be considerable in number and have a sense of urgency, in that sometimes they have acknowledged that their demand cannot be satisfied readily.

Nevertheless, what I have mentioned before is not yet sufficient to demonstrate that being born in a rich family condemns them to having not braced themselves for solving problems any more than those from a normal family. As far as I am concerned, the former ones are more likely to be strictly regulated since they will carry more responsibility of families’ honor, wealth and so on when they grow up. Whereas, the latter ones are generally spoiled by their parents with little foresight. Moreover, the greater living conditions allow the children of the rich to dabble in various fields and entry into a larger social circle, which provides a larger range of training opportunities, while their peers are limited in this aspect.

In conclusion, although children from normal families appear to be more ready for the coming hardship, it is more likely for the children from much more richer families to conquer the problems they will run up against.

[Good work.]