Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.(2)

So after the(/some) analysis (of this Subject), if we want to respond (to) the question, that(/if) laws should be (elastic enough)(/more flexible)?, we have to take many things into consideration. For instance, is it disinterested?? enough for many people to protect their rights?(..is its' importance justifying the cuts to the peoples' rights?)  Is it suit for the trend of (these/our) developingtimes? Is it about individual wish or the public desires? Is it just in the process of implementation?(/Is it just a question of Implementation?) Is it can it be correspond with the morality?(How does this [wish for Flexibility] interfere with our moral beliefs?) Specifically, what is the criterion of the just laws? (How can we assure the government officials all to be disinterested?)??(?..that we're acting in our best intentions and societies' interest?) These questions are difficulty to answer. However, based on (the) experiences and practices, the best way to solve it(/address this issue) is(/would be) that the government should draft a fundamental law. (It should keep relatively invariant, to be a criterion.)?(/One of the main Criterias must be, to act cautiously, aiming only marginal changes, preserving the law [in a] relatively invariant [state])  If many people want to change it, the government should use the dormancy way, such as voting, to change(/to engage this Process of change). Some laws, such as provincial rules, correspondingly can be (made more) flexible by a democratic way.

Laws are essential for a country to be bloom and (just,) so the government should be careful (to legislate and implement)(/with their Legislations and Implementations|to legislate whisely and to implement cleverly). And whether it should be flexible or not, it should keep an impartial attitude and a democratic way (to think about it)(/of thought| a democratic approach).