Equality, is to putting yourself in a the same position as your lover is.

OR

Equality, is putting yourself in the same position your lover is in.

Both the same, but 1st one is more proper.

Many girls think they are weaker, and are thus they are supposed to receive special treatment. They cry, shout, blame, or snub (wow, I was unsure of this word and I had to look it up. Makes sense, but it's a rarer word so it sounds out of place) once they feel uncomfortable. They think their mate couldn't can't understand. They take for granted (it's ok to split this phrase, but this was too far for writing; it gets confusing. Your original was ok for speech, though, because you could make a pause before saying "for granted") all of the good things that the men are doing good to for them for granted. It's interesting that males and females have different views in on many (or various) things. I'm not judging against anyone, but my point of view to (point: your main point or argument; view: your perspective / what you think; point of view: the reason for your view; the position responsible for your view) for the girls is, there's no superman in this world, and men are more like children when they fall in love. It's Things become more like a story about of slave and slaveholder (we'll usually say master) when your relationship is without equality.

It is very problematic but a LOT of Americans are making this mistake of misusing the word "judge." Judge is a simple word; it means to make a judgment. This is a very basic aspect of any living thing, from which we can make choices; there is no negative or positive sense to it. It is part of the decision process.

Yet, many people are using "judge" as if it means a bad thing, and consequently, they will defensively say "I'm not judging." Not only do they sound quite stupid, but it also creates a lot of confusion, because there's no easy choice for an alternative.

Now you know to expect this, but you should not be doing the same. You need to express your idea completely differently (which may be part of the reason why people are too lazy to stop doing this), because judge is the wrong word: you ARE judging; that's WHY you're making an argument! ;)

Will do the rest later.

[continued]

This sentence is pretty much ok, but for some reason it sounds a little strange to me. I THINK it's because when we say "A is (all) about B," the second thing "B" is usually a single thing. If you say more than one thing, then you are talking about different PARTS that make up the whole, so it's better to say something like (love concerns / love is made up of / love consists of） four things. Or, use a different verb that better explains the relationship between love and those 4 things)

Love is all about four things: communication, equality, compromise, and forgiveness. It will never works out without any of them. (“Love will never work without any of them" works fine. In this topic, "work out" will usually be used with "relationship," because "work out" is a process, like "solve." It CAN be used with "love," but not in this case.)

Communication, is to lets two different people get to know each other's mind. (Wordy; removing "get to" also makes it sound more certain.) We were all lonely (why lonely? I'm not sure what you want to say) individuals when we came into this world. There will never have be two exactly same people who are exactly alike / the same. The way we act, the way we think, is totally (informal / improper) completely different. So, without expressing yourself, how are others supposed to know what the hell is in your head? And by the way, when all of us we grow old (using "all of us" creates a very specific situation where EVERYONE is old), we lose our beautiful faces, may be (all of these situations could start with "may be," so just drop it) are unable to move around, have no energy to go to play or travel or anything (OR do anything else) something else, how can we stay together continue to spend the rest of our lives together? So (You've ended with a question, and this next sentence fits with it, so a conjunction is not needed.) to find Finding a communicative lover could solve all such problems. (You don't really mean ALL problems; you mean THESE or THESE KINDS of problems.)

Love is all about 4four things (the exact rules can be a little complex, but for the most part, spell out numbers below 21, since they are all short words. Only use the numbers in informal chat, but even then, you may do it only if you want to make the number very clear.）

[THIS COMMENT IS A TEST]