An abstract for my paper

Title:
Cooperation: On Orientation of China’s Policies of International Aid for Education

Abstract:
This paper means to propose an orientation for China’s policies of international aid for education. The first section provides an overview of China’s educational aid to other developing countries, especially African countries, in the past half decade, by which it identifies the problem that when delivering aid, China dedicates in its own business but hardly coordinates with other donors. In the next two sections, the paper provides several reasons to explain why China should cooperate with other donors from two perspectives. First, for the benefit of global education development, cooperating with other donors improves aid efficiency, and betters the current global education aid cooperation system—Global Partnership for Education, which is characterized with a polarized structure. Second, for the benefit of China, cooperating with other donors is a chance for China to spread its education aid ideology, and absorb new education development experience and education aid experience.

Generally speaking, the title means:China's international education aid policy should develop in a way that values cooperating with others. And I want to explain why I propose such an idea (so I use "On", like Bacon's On Studies) . Cooperation is a kind of policy "trend", or "orientation", or the "direction of the development of the policy". I google the phrase "policy orientation", and find it is a quite common phrase. So I made some modifications and name the paper as "Cooperation: On Orientation of China’s Policies of International Aid for Education". But, I feel that it is not that sound. I don't know why.