Is Social Science better than Pure Science? (The continuation) Students in Management course will surely be communicate to others every day and have enough strength to manage any problems. But what scientists work on and how they formulate their questions shape will make significant public or scientific, but we must think are all the formulas produced will be use all the time in our daily life? Can all the formulas be used in every company that we are working for? For example, as an electrical engineer, you may create a great deal of circuits having varied applications, some or most of which would be responsible for bettering our lives. But in the end, whatever you may create or do, rests on the four equations of Maxwell, and a bit of math. Taking you back to the right path, do you agree that a Pure Science person can be a Social Science student at the same time? Social Science is about understanding something with your heart, then use and shows it. So by understanding yourself, your history and your own capability, it is not possible for a Pure Science student to have Social Science energy in their selves. So in the process, you have produced applications, different ways of doing a thing, bettered the human life, but have essentially produced no new fundamental knowledge. Working on applications is important, else the world wouldn't be the way it is today, but as far as excitement and fulfillment is considered, I guess Pure Sciences do a better job at that. Finally for my opinion, both important streams in the world nowadays, Pure Science and Social Science both need each other.