A Good Manager

Topic: What is your idea about a good manager of a scientific research group?

Coupled with the increasingly fierce competition between researchers in at the international level, many countries realized realize that talents talent is the decisive factors factor in the contest. However, too many elites are of little use unless they are united with each other. To some degree, the group manager’s characters character determines a nation’s research potential. I believe there are three standers standards to judge whether a manager is effective or not.

First, to be a good leader, passion and vitality are indispensable. Scientific research has high requirements on imagination, creativity, logic, and motivation. Without passion, the daily research would become boring, even torturing; without vitality, the outcome would be perfunctory and partial. A manager’s passion and vitality is are the well from which people could dredge confidence and inspiration. It is hard to image imagine a creative group leaded led by a zeal less leader someone without zeal.

Secondly, a good manager must have perspective. The advantage of a research group lies in its wise arrangement of human resources. Successors inherit ideas and approaches from the forerunners predecessors and carry on their research. in this course event, managers must be able to figure out whether the research is promising to carry out and in which direction should the research it should develop to.

Thirdly, leadership is the precondition of a successful group. There is no denying that many talented researchers are straightforward frank and arrogant. They spend their wisdom in dealing with data and ideas, paid paying little attention to human interaction and communication. Thus, how to maintaining a harmonious atmosphere in which researchers can fluently cooperation with each other is a big problem which and requires a high level of leadership ability.