Can TV be an alternative to schools? When an education process was disrupted in March this year, the authorities of Pakistan cobbled a semblance of educational program on TV. You can't blame them because most of Pakistan children can't have online lessons instead of coming to offline classes (they just don't have computers or smartphones). Are these lessons better than nothing? I think so. Some students can't afford underground teachers, so they use airing TV as the only opportunity to keep up. Otherwise their grades can slip very quickly. So very hardworking children would be thankful for educational TV channel, it helps them not to drop out. Moreover, they even prefer watching TV near their slums to attend to lessons with real teachers. In public schools they're very brutal, little students are afraid of them. On the other side, professional educators think that "TV school" is not a good idea at all. The lessons are boring, focusing on the point that students should learn the material by heart. Tell me, is it worths to memorise financial literacy without understanding it? Some people even suppose that "TV school" is just the way the goverment get rid of the problem. And we shouldn't forget that many of Pakistan families even don't have TVs at home! It's very sad to look at Pakistan mango saler, holding a creased paper with the names of people who borrowed him money from just to afford a better education for his child.